AWS vs Shared Hosting – Using the Amazon Cloud Compared with a Static Server

In this article, we discuss “AWS vs Shared Hosting“, which is shorthand for comparing the use of the Amazon Cloud to host your website (by using Amazon Web Service server space), compared with the much better-known method of using a “Static Server” such as provided by any bog-standard shared hosting service.

On This Page

    1. Why use AWS for web hosting?
    2. Shared Web Hosting
    3. Simple Static Website Hosting
    4. Best Shared and Cloud Hosting Services
    5. What is Cloud Hosting vs. Shared Hosting?
    6. Which Service is Right for You?
    7.  “Shared Hosting” Providers
    8. “Shared Hosting” Providers with SSDs
    9. Free vs. Paid Hosting Services: Which is Best?

Why use AWS for web hosting?

Let’s get this first thing straight before we go on! Why would anyone use AWS for web hosting? The answer is because Amazon Web Services is often rated the highest in comparisons of web hosts. You will need to take some AWS training to use these tools properly. It’s not for newbies. If this is your first website and you’ve been doing websites for more than say 3 years we doubt that anyone other than the most “geek inclined” will want to use AWS for website building. If you are new to website creation you will do best to stay with a static server. As long as you read some reviews, talk to a few hosting companies, and read the small print, you should be able to find an excellent hosting platform.

You might even do well to consider our web hosting service EZi-Gold Hosting here!

Still here. Still, reading? Then you’ve almost definitely heard about Amazon Web Services. And, given that you’re on this site, I’m going to make the obvious assumption that you’ve heard about WordPress, too. But what you might not have heard about is combining WordPress with amazon web services (AWS) for web hosting! (More later on.)

Amazon Web Services Logo used here to illustrate this AWS vs Shared Hosting article.Why choose AWS? Choose it for speed and reliability of delivery globally, but it is also cheap and for most users it’s free. Free, until we reach the free storage limit which Amazon allows before imposing a monthly charge. It’s fast and they must make it so as the same system powers their Amazon eCommerce business. For the same reason, it has to be reliable. Reliability is one of the most important features that cloud hosting offers. Rather than hosting your website on a shared server, it can be better to host your website on an Amazon dedicated virtual cloud server which draws its resource, such as disk space, from an extensive network of underlying physical servers.

Shared Web Hosting

The Google Cloud Logo.Shared web hosting might not have the global presence of Amazon, but it does have its merits, other than of course being simple to use. Shared hosting on a reliable server architecture that is configured and designed specifically for the type of software you are using to power your application or website is fine to use. It results in perfectly adequate performance and excellent up-time for normal web pages, including eCommerce. The best online shared hosting provides page load speeds which are every bit as good as Google expects. Added speed is often available from server-level caching applications baked right into the hosting environment. Users just have to turn these additional services on, and doing so is much simpler than installing the website in the first place on AWS servers. Users of our own EZi-Gold hosting even get the best of both worlds. By using EZi-Gold Hosting you get a simple way to place your website on the cloud using a service called Cloudfront and like Amazon, use of the cloud app is free up to a limit and then the charge is very inexpensive.

Single page web apps are defined as web apps that are static and require only one single load in a browser. These need adding to AWS and this is a disadvantage of AWS vs Shared Hosting which has a CMS (i.e. WordPress free and ready to install). The following user interactions are made available through:. Html. Css. They are already preloaded in the browser.

Simple Static Website Hosting

Web hosting review AWS vs Shared HostingIs AWS Cloudfront is still the best place to host my static website? What about Google Cloud Storage, Netlify or GitHub pages? These shared hosting services all stack up, for some people and website applications, but on this page, we have no more space than to discuss AWS vs Shared Hosting. Running a simple static website sometimes makes it necessary to scale due to high traffic. In addition, shared hosting is not suitable for serving videos, whereas AWS is.

When comparing amazon web services (AWS) hosting and a typical large shared hosting provider such as Bluehost, Siteground (recommended), or Godaddy it’s like comparing apples to oranges for the most part. Bluehost is aimed at first-time bloggers and entrepreneurs looking to set up a website in a simple way.

However, AWS has so many hosting options, before even considering 3rd party options which make it easy to use AWS server space, that it’s impossible to discuss their products in this review. We’ll be focusing on AWS in general, but you’ll need to read through their provisions Amazon s3, plus their ec2 hosting offerings, as well as their Amazon AWS Lightsail cloud hosting product which is focused on the small business/non-technical market.

AWS vs Shared Hosting – Best Shared and Cloud Hosting Services

The best shared-host may be one which offers “Managed (WordPress) Hosting”. This is often a tier that offers some WordPress specific features that “shared hosting” doesn’t, as well as often being more performant for heavy WordPress sites than WordPress is. You may also see offers of a “Managed Cloud Hosting Platform”. If so take care to read the service details very carefully as “cloud” is the most overused term in hosting.

Connecting up to a system like Cloudflare can make this much easier. Hosting is a little more complicated than your domain purchase. Most first-time web designers won’t be building something which will have to deal with thousands of visitors every day, and this means that shared hosting or VPS servers will be ideal in a lot of cases.

In addition to the more popular web hosting options, we suggest you consider players like Heroku, Microsoft Azure, Google Cloud Platform, Amazon web services and Digital Ocean when purchasing a node.

What is Cloud Hosting vs. Shared Hosting?

Infographic shows the concept of shared vs cloud hosting.When encountering the inexhaustible range of shared hosting plans for the first time, the cloud hosting vs. shared hosting debate can easily overwhelm site owners with the various options, configurations, and acronyms. Matching the right server portions and hosting flavours to your appetite can be daunting, but we’re happy to serve as your waiter and present this week’s specials: cloud hosting and shared hosting.

Cloud hosting vs shared hosting? You are here because you are planning on hosting your website. Want to know the difference between cloud hosting or shared hosting like GoDaddy and a cloud-based hosting such as amazon web services? OK, follow this article to have a clear picture.

How is Cloud Hosting different vs Shared Hosting? In Cloud Hosting Services the accounts get separated by entire virtual machines, and you have the complete access to a working computer. In Shared Hosting all the accounts are on one computer and must share the total resources among hundreds or even thousands of accounts.

Which Service is Right for You?

Siteground Hosting is illustrated here with the SiteGround hosting logo.Before we detail the nitty-gritty differences and similarities between shared hosting and cloud hosting services, it’s time to find the meal that best suits your taste and budget — you might be craving a burger, but do you prefer it come from a greasy fast-food joint or an acclaimed chef at a sit-down restaurant?.

The shared vs managed WordPress hosting debate comes down to the added WordPress-specific services and performance shared hosting tweaks you get with managed WordPress hosting. Managed WordPress hosting is like a concierge service for your WordPress site, whereas regular shared hosting leaves much of the work to you when it comes to backups, WordPress optimization, and more.

When comparing the cost of cloud hosting vs shared hosting. Godaddy starts as low as a fixed monthly price of $1 per month, whereas done for you AWS packages begin at a minimum of $50 and above a month. But the price offers an additional 1 terabyte of disk space, which when compared to the 100 GB GoDaddy makes the GoDaddy offer really quite small. Our experience of GoDaddy is that the headline price is always low, but you will soon become frustrated when they constantly try to squeeze more money out of you through charging for 1,001 “extras”. Extras, which elsewhere are part of the main package and are free to use. However, the headline price is always more to start with, if later you won’t get pestered to buy extras each month.

“Shared Hosting” Providers

Its drawbacks are that it can be relatively slow, especially if neighbouring sites on the same server experience traffic spikes, and tends to make relatively few server resources available to any-one Hostinger Logo illustrates the paragraph on Hostinger Shared Hosting.customer. Our top recommendation for a large (rather anonymous) shared WordPress hosting is Siteground.

If you are on a server with many active high-activity accounts, performance may be more limited as you must wait for your share of time for resources. Typically, shared hosting providers manage this by placing restrictions on resource usage on shared servers.

Think of a virtual private server as a blend of the shared hosting environment with the cloud-minded features of control and dedicated resources. The difference between virtual and cloud servers is fairly small and can be difficult to understand, but many providers opt to blend the two server architectures to take advantage of the high-availability strengths found in the cloud.

“Shared Hosting” Providers with SSDs vs AWS

If you are looking for Shared SSD hosting, you probably want fast and stable hosting overall. So it’s good to combine SSDs with VPS and dedicated servers. Also good to have are features like high-performance databases, caching, and access to a quality CDN. Solid-state drives (SSDs) are generally faster and more dependable than mechanical drives. They are important for getting the fastest hosting speeds, especially on dynamic websites such as WordPress sites. But not all hosts offer SSD storage, so you need to be careful to check the hosting plan for SSDs before you buy.

SSDs can allow greater flexibility to scale your website. A natural rule of thumb is that access to a greater number of resources will result in better performance. While shared hosting providers use the latest hardware and software techniques such as SSDs and CDNs to guarantee performance, generally speaking, you’ll get even better results with a VPS server account.

AWS vs Shared Hosting – Free vs. Paid Hosting Services: Which is Best?

Many internet service providers (ISPS) offer a basic website service free to subscribers. Individuals and organizations may also obtain web page hosting from alternative service providers. Free web hosting services are offered by different companies in the hope that once committed to using their server you won’t want the hassle of moving your account and will upgrade. The free offerings come with limited services, sometimes supported by advertisements, and are always very limited when compared to paid hosting.

When considering AWS vs Shared Hosting, AWS can be seen as free, but only if you have the skills to create websites on their server space unassisted by expensive add-on 3rd party services. AWS themselves only charges you for the resources you use, with no up-front costs or long-term contracts. AWS web hosting options offer pay-as-you-go pricing or fixed monthly pricing. The basic nature of their server configurations means they are best for static web apps that require only a single load in a web browser are referred to as “single-page” web apps. If you need add-on apps though, that’s when AWS costs can get out of control very quickly.

Free web hosting may sound like a good idea but usually, as a beginner, you won’t get the support you need. Free web hosting is not always the best choice unless you know what you are doing, and if you do know your way around setting up websites you will want the extra features of paid hosting to help you make money. So, that’s our opinion when starting you may want to play around with free web hosting, but if you are going to make a going of website creation and monetizing your efforts, paid-hosting is the way to go, even if only using a low-cost and basic account.

If you do want to try it for free, we’ve been told that 000webhost is a version of Hostinger free of charge, and they’ve been around since 2007. They don’t force any ads on their users like some other services, and they also offer paid plans. They provide up to two websites, 1,000 MB of storage, an impressive 10gb of bandwidth, with a free control panel. Nevertheless, you get what you pay for in the end. If you are serious about applying your time why not try out our EZi-Gold Hosting?

The post AWS vs Shared Hosting – Using the Amazon Cloud Compared with a Static Server appeared first on GQ Central.